Returning from injury and playing 90 minutes at Lincoln, Lloyd Jones says his fellow players are to blame for long ball tactics: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/sport/lloyd-jones-welcomes-positive-draw-at-lincoln-city-and-says-players-take-the-blame-for-recent-long-ball-antics/
Of course he can't criticise the manager publicly, but the return of players like him may well improve the standard of play.
Nathan Jones says he felt that Conor Coventry wasn't fit enough to play at Lincoln: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/sport/nathan-jones-explains-conor-coventry-absence-during-draw-at-lincoln-city/
He said he did not name a substitute goalkeeper because he wanted to be 'positive'. Substitutes were available. That seems a bit risky to me given that we no longer have a 'Steve Brown' who did well in goal when called upon.
BTW, I don't think Nathan Jones is beyond criticism. I didn't think Curbs was: he often left substitutions too late to make a difference. But I do think Jones knows more about football than many of his critics. Sometimes I think we should just get rid of a coach and let a fans' committee take the decisions. Many of them think they know what to do: 'if we can see it, why can't he?'
I was conscious when I had two knee replacement operations, but I didn't criticise the surgeon for his technique. Good job he hadn't learn it on the internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment